The Devil
IHTFP
Prove to me that the Moon is not composed primarily of cheese, then I'll get back to you with proof that your silly theory is equally wrong.
The Devil said:Anex,
What SPL is required to induce vibration of any significance in a Mana stand?
I simply do not believe that the feedback loop you describe above exists in any meaningful way for any stand.
I contend that stands deal first & foremost with internally-generated vibrations coming from the equipment itself.
You concede the washing machine analogy was bogus?Who said anything about changing the frequency response of just one?! Your just picking the bits out you like.
You've made a thousand assumptions and not put any ballpark figures on the sizes of your 'vibrations'. Or the delay before they 'arrive'. Or shown any reason to believe there would be a correlation between the 'vibrations' and the signal. Or how this effect can be a general characteristic of Mana and yet not cause howl round, or manfestations thereof.Now the needle is picking up the groove, plus the 1KHz spike generated by all the material resonances.
Only a broken, badly designed or badly installed one. Perhaps this is a clue?you can hear air borne feed back in a tt easily enough
Paul Ranson said:Only a broken, badly designed or badly installed one. Perhaps this is a clue?
Paul
It's no such thing. It's a demonstration of adding two signals together, which does not change the frequency response of the turntable.The washing machine analogy isn't bogus, its a demonstration of how placing a turntable on something that is vibrating alters the frequency response of the turntable.
The problem is that you haven't made any assumptions. No computer models are required, just some educated guesswork. Sanity check your theory. You've decided what size of effect you need to have on the system as a whole, an audible frequency response error, probably one large enough to dominate room effects since some people claim to be able to hear it in arbitrary systems. Working out how big a disturbance is required at the stylus should follow, and that could be easily measured in the setup I proposed.Course I've made assumptions, integrating that sort of maths would take forever.
Have you any experience at all of competent turntables? Whatever they're mounted on?Put your stylus on the platter, switch to tt input and crank up, if you don't get howl you can probably get feedback by shouting at the stylus.
Paul Ranson said:It's no such thing. It's a demonstration of adding two signals together, which does not change the frequency response of the turntable.
The problem is that you haven't made any assumptions. No computer models are required, just some educated guesswork. Sanity check your theory. You've decided what size of effect you need to have on the system as a whole, an audible frequency response error, probably one large enough to dominate room effects since some people claim to be able to hear it in arbitrary systems. Working out how big a disturbance is required at the stylus should follow, and that could be easily measured in the setup I proposed.
Have you any experience at all of competent turntables? Whatever they're mounted on?
BTW what's your proposed mechanism for this feedback with a CDP as a source?
Paul
Paul Ranson said:I cannot explain your subjective impressions, which do not agree with mine.
Paul
Well, 'dramatically' is a start.It changes the frequency response of what is output by the TT (dramatically), this is the point. I didn't put any kind of size on things,I said the effect is there and it means mana or anything else has an effect on the frequency response of a system.