30 years on...

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's not just noise Mana removes, it clearly attenuates what is there on more balanced supports.

Sadly, in the lack of any tests from the manufacturer or interested parties, it is difficult to prove this. Perhaps someone here could take up the baton?
 
The Devil said:
Markus, please take a few minutes to write a post about whether you believe that Mana alters the tonal balance. You've heard my system. Can you please tell the audience here whether you think that there are any audible tonal abnormalities.
I haven't heard your system without Mana, so I can't say anything about it.

I can say that I used to have a Mana Reference Table, and still own an (unused) custom amp stand. Both IMO did change the tonal balance compared to other stands (not current commercial products).

I quite liked the effect at the time, I have to say. My turntable and my then valve amps both seemed to benefit.

I have no opinion on multi-phase Mana.
 
The Devil said:
The implicit suggestion here is that Mana stands alter the pitch of notes. This is bollocks.
I don't see that being implied anywhere. If it were, it would be bollox.

Michael.
 
Stereo Mic said:
It's not just noise Mana removes, it clearly attenuates what is there on more balanced supports.

Sadly, in the lack of any tests from the manufacturer or interested parties, it is difficult to prove this. Perhaps someone here could take up the baton?
It's your theory - therefore you have to prove it.
 
Markus Sauer said:
I haven't heard your system without Mana, so I can't say anything about it.

Why not? I have to say it seems odd that in your posts about my system, you've never mentioned any perceived oddities in the frequency response.

I have no opinion on multi-phase Mana.

Why not? Is it because this alleged effect isn't present?
 
The Devil said:
It's your theory - therefore you have to prove it.

It's not a theory. It's a conclusion based on listening extensively to Mana supported systems and comparing them with others.

I don't have to prove anything. You are the one claiming Mana lowers the noise floor and doesn't alter the tonal balance.
 
Exactly - I'm claiming it doesn't do anything at all to the tonal balance - and that is why I have nothing to prove. It is, in fact, unprovable, since no-one can prove a negative (e.g. non-existence of God, etc).

The noise floor is lowered by reducing vibration - and that's a completely separate argument, nothing to do with the music signal.
 
Paul Ranson said:
Can someone clarify the purported mechanism where 'vibration' from the stand changes the frequency response of a hifi component? If we take the washing machine proposal seriously for a nanosecond how can adding two signals together be considered as a change in the frequency response of just one?

Paul

What?! Who said anything about changing the frequency response of just one?! Your just picking the bits out you like. I've already stated the whole thing is a feedback loop. Think of a TT, nice and simple. Needle runs in groove, needle picks up variations in the groove as vibrations. Vibrations played thro speaker, travel thro air and into stand (this is entirely forgetting about any motor vibrations etc. seeings as we obviously need to keep this EXTREMELY simple). Stand resonates, we'll use one easy frequency so we all know where we stand (ha ha) 1KHz. Stand now contains original airborne vibrations with a hump at 1KHz (amplitude of hump varies according to material etc.). Vibrations travel through the stand, some up, some down, we'll just consider up, again for simplicity. The vibrations travel upwards into the TT, causing various parts of the deck to respond in sympathy, again altering the vibrations, perhaps for better, perhaps for worse, but eventually some of the vibrations end up in the record which, again, has its own resonant frequency somewhere but lets just assume the whole system resonates at our 1K. Now the needle is picking up the groove, plus the 1KHz spike generated by all the material resonances. Some people may like this (doubtful but you never know) in which case, its the right system/stand for them, most people would probably run a mile, in which case it is not. I hope this clarifies things.

Bub: passive or active it is the vibrations that matter, not where they come from, just where they are at the time. Not that it matters as your argument seems to be a continually evolving thing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Devil said:
It is, in fact, unprovable, since no-one can prove a negative (e.g. non-existence of God, etc).

Its not unproveable at all. Get a speaker, mic, soundcard of known impulse response measured to the best possible accuracy, stand speaker on mana/whatever and retake impulse response. I can absolutely guarantee you will see a different response at the end. Compare it to a load of other stuff if you like, they'll all be different, none of them will give you perfect MLS back in again.
 
Thanks for that Anex - very concisely put.

I personally supsect that JW stumbled upon a combination that resulted in a sypathetic resonator suited to the excesses of the LP12 many years ago. Yes Bub, that IS a theory. A case of two wrongs making a right. Sadly I don't think one size fits all, and the affects on the tonal balance of other equipment is unpredictable, and in some cases, the Mana solution has no effect whatsoever (as I believe Fox discovered).
 
Anex,

What SPL is required to induce vibration of any significance in a Mana stand?

I simply do not believe that the feedback loop you describe above exists in any meaningful way for any stand.

I contend that stands deal first & foremost with internally-generated vibrations coming from the equipment itself.
 
The Devil said:
I contend that stands deal first & foremost with internally-generated vibrations coming from the equipment itself.

On what evidence is this contention made?

Using your own reasoning, when you make a cotention, it is up to you to provide some sort of factual evidence.

BTW
I have no belief/knowledge/opinion on the supposition.
 
It's based upon my own observations. I am a serial stand-fondler. You can learn a lot by just feeling with your fingertips.

God (hoho) gave us our very own "vibration sense", seems silly not to use it, and it's free.

I also possess a stethoscope, for some reason.
 
I've always thought it was funny that we have specific nerve fibres & CNS tracts exclusively devoted to "vibration sense". Clearly, God is a hi-fi geek.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top