cougarboy said:
HI, some feedback on the Final's - I heard two demos on Monday at different dealers, but both demos were of the 600PLs. One demo was with Sugden Masterclass amps, the other demo was using the Lyngdorf digital amps (TDA2200). Both seemed to drive the speakers exceptionally well.
Very difficult to make comparisons with the Clarity's, given that I was in unfamiliar rooms etc, but I'd say that if you are looking for an ELS speaker they are equal to the ML's; they are open, fast and transparent. They don't seem too fussy about room positioning, but they have a huge base plinth that takes some accommodating, it has a BIG footprint. From what I've heard, they do need a subwoofer, and Final state they expect them to be used with one. I didn't audition the subs.
I still can't decide if I can live with ELS long term. They are incredibly revealing, but with many CD's I've found that doesn't always equate to musical. I have a lot of CDs that I can't listen to on my demo ML's - they just sound a mess. Some of them happen to be some of my favourite albums too. There can be a thinness to vocals that can border on the irritating
I also demo'd the new JMLab Electra 1007BE's, which I thought were stunning.
Biggest revelation though was the Masterclass amps - these Sugden amps are simply outstanding. An absolute stunner with the Electra's.
In passing I also heard the Dali Euphonia MS4 and the ART Expression v6. They were all extremely impressive in different ways. If I had to make a decision without a home demo, it would be for the JMLabs 1007 (but on the end of the Sugden Masterclass!!)
Still no closer to a final(no pun) decision...
cheers,
tom.
Cheers for the review Tom,
Glad to hear the Final's sound like electrostats! Not glad to hear about the large base plinth - they definitely aren't photographed with these! I've hear that their small/medium sized models need a sub too, which is bad news for me. Couldn't get away with the larger models either - housemates would complain!
Interesting comments re transparency. IMO this is more often than not a bad thing. Assuming that only a small fraction (say 20%) of my music collection is "well-recorded", do I really want speakers that are going to murder the other 80%? Had this problem with CD players in the past - sometimes they were too revealing for their own good. I'm definitely more in the warm/euphonic/musicality camp than the "hi-fi" camp......
...which makes your fondness of Focal speakers seem a bit strange to me. IME these are definitely about "hi-fi" and not musical presentation. Last pair I owned were way to strident/revealing/bright (and this was with a super-smooth Pathos amp). Not designed with valve amp users in mind either, afaik.
Bit of a conundrum really. I want the smooth, airy treble of ESL57's with the punch & timing of standmounts. ESL57's are too ugly and have too large a footprint, ML's are thirsty and struggle to integrate properly, Final's need a subwoofer, Ribbon tweeters have narrow dispersion and rarely integrate properly....
....the list of compromises goes on.
TBH I have the same sort of problem as you - I'm really struggling about where to go next with my speakers. Obviously 20wpc SET's aren't the last word in flexibility, but they're the heart of my system and aren't going anywhere.
Sort of drifting towards ribbon tweeter standmounts, as these may offer the least damaging mix of compromises. Not many examples around though. I do remember seeing some standmounts with electrostatics tweeters once upon a time. They looked a bit weird of course. Has anyone else seen/heard these?
DT