technobear
Ursine Audiophile
The biggest difference in what sense? It very much depends on what aspects of a performance are important to you. If the source doesn't get those aspects right then the best speaker in the world will not change that.Originally posted by stebbo
I will start off by saying that Speaker purchases make the biggest difference.
Furthermore, there are not many truly bad speakers out there. There are, on the other hand, lots of CD players out there that are, to quote another esteemed member, 'as rough as a badger's arse'. Until you have a source that plays what's on the disc without undue softening and without added roughness, any further money spent on speakers is wasted.
And even when you have a great source, if your amplifier doesn't have the balls for the bass or is grainy and hard in the treble or is just plain slow, then again, no amount of money spent on speakers will save you from audio purgatory.
On the other hand, it is possible to get a superb performance out of a £900 CD player, a £600 amp and a £300 speaker. I know, I've done it. And what's more, improving the amplifier will give, within the loudness limits of the chosen speaker, a far bigger improvement in musical enjoyment than spending the same on speakers on the end of a less than superb amplifier.
Whilst I wouldn't disagree that the speakers have the greatest influence on the character of the sound you hear, when it comes to sound quality and particularly musicality and enjoyment, it has to be source first.
Oh and finally. If you take a great source and amplifier and feed them crap mains then you have wasted your money. So perhaps it should be mains first, then source, then amp, then speakers.
:JOEL:
Last edited by a moderator: