7_V said:
As a reviewer, PM has been reviewing speakers for 15 years, generally using the same (albeit Naim) setup. He probably gets, say, 50 speaker systems per year and listens to each in depth.
He may be 'only presenting an opinion on a product just as we do'. Nevertheless, I tend to give that opinion some value.
[...]
this is a very good point, imho, and the one thing that can justify getting magazines at this day and age (apart from the smell...

)
for sure a good number of people in the forums, through their activities or through their experience have listened to a fair amount of kit, and altogether, they will cover a vast amount, but having the ability to compare them all is difficult, and a point in favour of a "professional" reviewer.
however, this credibility they built over time is completely useless if there is any threat pending on the independence or credibility of the reviews put forward. this is the capital sin of a reviewer, so any conflict of interests is a bad idea. in the it analysis business people are not allowed to have shares of any software company, regardless of them operating in their sector of expertise or not (at least in some credible companies this is what happens). precisely for the same reason...
now, RG has open himself a can of worms... he should have steered well clear of the fora and not buy himself a war he is so ill equiped to win...
i think hifi mags have a place if they demonstrate independence, coherence and trustworthyness... opinions are opinions, anyone can give them away, but if you are out to sell them, you need to be more convincing. for sure there are ways of doing that and some were put across here already.
people like RG coming out attacking online fora will do mags no favours - it will only make people see them as arrogant prats that snob the rest of the true hifi enthusiasts... those who once used to buy their very magazines.
my two pence.
:beer:
Jack