Stereo Mic said:
Garmt,
Lyngdorf do not have the capacity to build their own CD player and Peter's connections with NAD have led to collaborations in the past, hence my post.
Chris, Boz, the owner of Tact, owns the intellectual rights to the digital room correction software. Since the split of the company, Peter had been able to sell the RCS, but given that he announced a RCS module for the TDA2200 without consulting Boz, I understand that arrangement came under stress.
Garmt, RCS under development? For When? They can't use anything based on the TACT software or they risk being sued. Boz was the guy behind the original and he is no longer there. Finally, given Tact's track record in announcing products about three years before availability, I would not hold my breathe if I were you!
It might well be that they will buy in the off the shelf board from Dynaton currently used by Copland. Being a Danish company this would make sense, and, given that the Dynaton software looks remarkably like the Tact, the link may go even deeper than that!
To see David at Tact now recommending a parametric EQ over the RCS system simply because they only sell the former, is sad IMHO and suggests the company is in something of a mess.
RCS can work wonderfully well but you need to experiment and know what you are doing. I have never heard it well set up at a show since Tact UK was setup. This is a shame.
Boz was the designer and brains behind the original Tact. Peter the money guy with the contacts. Going forward, I would expect the exciting developments to come from Boz, who now owns Tact and operates from the US. Chris, it was Karsten who left and Joined B&O.
Hi Guys.
Cards on the table.
I work for TacT/Lyngdorf UK in the North West of England.
I heard about this forum and in particular this thread. There seems to be a little misinformation going on and so thought I would comment. I'm certainly not here for a war of words, merely to state a few facts.
I have a very close working relationship with David Rapoport and Peter Lyngdorf and have the greatest respect for them both.
The CD-1 CD player is released in the next couple of weeks. It is an in house designed product and has nothing to do with NAD. Peter now has several of the worlds to digital audio engineers on his team working on new products.
Regarding Room Correction. Boz does own the rights for his RCS, but not all types of Room Correction. The Lyngdorf system is again an in house product using new technology. There are links to Dynaton, but the new system is all new and will not share any of the Dynaton/Copland technology.
It is to be given its first outing at CES in January in a 2.2 system using MH1's and W210's and will be available later in 2006.
True that the Room Correction does need skill to set up and get good results. As the new RCS software & firmware develops it will have a 1 button set up facility that allows novice users to correct for the room at the push of a button and then simply voice the system to their tastes.
The software will also give the user the usual control. A great step forwards I'm sure you will agree.
Regarding TacT/Lyngdorf UK.
TacT/Lyngdorf UK is in great shape and currently distributes Exactpower, Stillpoints and Audiodesksysteme. We also sell Dali, Silver Arrow, Vertex AQ along side Lyngdorf.
Any comments to the contrary are just some ones 'opinion' and have no grounding.
When the split between TacT US and TacT dk came we had to choose a direction and to us it was a 'no brainer'.
We don't recommend EQ over Room Correction. We just don't advise that customers spend £3300 on a RCS when they can soon buy a TDA2200 amp with RCS built in for similar money. We used RC at the recent Heathrow Show.
Regarding the sound at shows in the UK. Peter sets up the sound at shows as he always has, so there should be no difference between now and before TacT UK was set up. Peter's taste in sound does not always agree with everyone, but with our digital products that is something we have control of, unlike most other hi-fi, so personal tastes can be adjusted for.
Regarding the use of corner woofers. This is not by any means essential. Great bass can be achieved using a 2.0 set up. There are however good reasons for using corner loaded woofers. There is some information on the subject hereââ'¬Â¦Ã¢â'¬Â¦.
www.tactaudio.dk/qa_subs_1.html
We all have vested interests and loyalties in hi-fi and it should be kept in mind that these are just people's opinions and not necessarily based in fact. Can I please ask that personal comments be left out of posts?
Anyone who wishes to make their own mind up about any of our products only has to contact us.
Anyone interested in purchasing products are quite welcome to visit for a demo.
I am currently running a 2.2 EQ'd

system.
TDA > Dali MS4's
SDA > Lyngdorf W210 corner woofers
Stillpoints ESS and Component stand under Equitech Balanced Power Unit.
Stello transport (soon to be replaced bty CD-1)
If anyone has questions I will try and answer, but I don't have much time free to visit forums often.
I can be contacted directly at
tactuknw@tiscali.co.uk
Many thanks.
Bob Patefield
TacT/Lyngdorf UK