David, you are talking complete nonsense.
I did read your last post and gave it the response I thought appropriate.
What you are presenting is not evidence - if you truly feel that it does represent evidence it simply shows that your standards aren't particularly high and that you don't understand the argument even at the most basic level, to put it mildly.
If you regard my approach as 'pseudo-scientific' then spell out your precise criticisms. Better still, take up one of the numerous offers I've made to demonstrate that you are misguided. It won't take long
Well, up for a real test?
Or would you prefer a poll?
Nonsense ?
Where??
What have I said thats incorrect?
Instead of throwing silly adjectives around, just answer that!
As far as test are concerned I think I've said before I have neither the time and certainly not the resouces (I can't afford new kit every few mins, remember?) to travel extensively, thank you.
(I'm not entirely sure why I should be "tested" anyway, for your satisfaction, or otherwise).
Like I say I'm away from this now for the most part but I do wish you would give a slightly more balanced impression on the forum.
