That's sort of what I was trying to say. FWIW I'd take an excellent stereo active system over a similarly priced passive 5.1 job. I think that more than one speaker begins to be a distraction, but I can just tolerate having two... Stereo adds a small amount more information to mono, 5.1 adds an even smaller amount at an even greater incremental cost. It's definitely a sales and marketing oriented invention. So junior AV if you must have swirly effects in films but it shouldn't severely compromise the hifi, this is michaelab's conundrum. He needs to find a way to choose the best stereo pre-power for his circumstances. Paul