tones
compulsive cantater
Fascinated by all this lathe stuff (and frankly not believing a single word of it), I decided, in the interests of science, to try it. Herr Gläss, the manufacturer, offers to lathe up to 3 CDs for you for the cost of return postage. So I bought another copy of my favourite test disc, the marvellous Pinnock/English Concert version of Handel's Water Music, and sent it off to him. It duly returned and I tried it out. And how did the lathed disc sound? Absolutely marvellous. The only slight problem was that the original sounded equally marvellous. In fact, the difference was nothing. More precisely, absolutely nothing. So, for the cost of a CD, another case of mything inaction revealed.
Another thing really concerns me about this thing. The reflective surface of a CD is metallic aluminium. Aluminium reacts with atmospheric oxygen with the speed of greased lightning, which is why it is applied to the polycarbonate base of a CD under conditions of high vacuum and a protective coating of acrylic then applied over the top. This device is cutting away part of that acrylic protection. Somebody said somewhere that the black edging is to prevent oxidation. However, if you have exposed the aluminium, it is already too late to prevent oxidation. And even if you don't expose the aluminium, the fact that you have made that possibility even more possible is completely unacceptable to me, and I wouldn't lathe my CDs, even if I had heard a substantial improvement. To spend a small fortune to give oneself the possibility of ruining a valuable CD collection for no sound gain whatsoever appears to me to border on lunacy.
But what about you folk that say this thing works? I know you to be sincere individuals, even if sincerely wrong, and this is meant to be no reflection
on you. However, I feel this is another case of people hearing what they want to hear. Moreover, this seems to be yet another manifestation of a particular desire to exercise some control over technology. On the face of it, CD would appear to have removed all the endless tweakiness of turntables ââ'¬â€œ and we have to remember how important the ââ'¬Å"toy factorââ'¬Â is to some folk. Apparently, the Flanders & Swann Syndrome:
But I never did care for music much!
It's the high-fi-del-it-tee!
is alive and well. Such devices, plus all the other green pens, CD mats, etc., give the appearance of restoration of control over technology, and I suspect that many folk like this idea.
Now the standard let-out clause appears to be that it may not work well or at all with some CDs/systems and very well with others. Sorry, but to me this is complete piffle. It either works or it doesn't. And to me the answer is clear.
In conclusion, this sounded like the cue for a song ââ'¬â€œ so here is The Lathe Song, to a possibly familiar tune:
Lathe, ill vice
At high price
Skims acrylic from CD
In a trice
Makes sound nice
Say folk happy to fleece thee
Bevel precise said to stop stray light
In its flight to D/A
Better byte
Clean and bright
Differences night and day
So it's said
By those wed
To beliefs in strange tweaking
Plus obscene
Magazines
Golden-eared and self-seeking
Reduced protection for alumin-
-Yum is dim, not clever
Too thin? Then, oxygen
Wrecks your CDs forever.
Another thing really concerns me about this thing. The reflective surface of a CD is metallic aluminium. Aluminium reacts with atmospheric oxygen with the speed of greased lightning, which is why it is applied to the polycarbonate base of a CD under conditions of high vacuum and a protective coating of acrylic then applied over the top. This device is cutting away part of that acrylic protection. Somebody said somewhere that the black edging is to prevent oxidation. However, if you have exposed the aluminium, it is already too late to prevent oxidation. And even if you don't expose the aluminium, the fact that you have made that possibility even more possible is completely unacceptable to me, and I wouldn't lathe my CDs, even if I had heard a substantial improvement. To spend a small fortune to give oneself the possibility of ruining a valuable CD collection for no sound gain whatsoever appears to me to border on lunacy.
But what about you folk that say this thing works? I know you to be sincere individuals, even if sincerely wrong, and this is meant to be no reflection

But I never did care for music much!
It's the high-fi-del-it-tee!
is alive and well. Such devices, plus all the other green pens, CD mats, etc., give the appearance of restoration of control over technology, and I suspect that many folk like this idea.
Now the standard let-out clause appears to be that it may not work well or at all with some CDs/systems and very well with others. Sorry, but to me this is complete piffle. It either works or it doesn't. And to me the answer is clear.
In conclusion, this sounded like the cue for a song ââ'¬â€œ so here is The Lathe Song, to a possibly familiar tune:
Lathe, ill vice
At high price
Skims acrylic from CD
In a trice
Makes sound nice
Say folk happy to fleece thee
Bevel precise said to stop stray light
In its flight to D/A
Better byte
Clean and bright
Differences night and day
So it's said
By those wed
To beliefs in strange tweaking
Plus obscene
Magazines
Golden-eared and self-seeking
Reduced protection for alumin-
-Yum is dim, not clever
Too thin? Then, oxygen
Wrecks your CDs forever.