analoguekid said:Yeah Paul, but for the retail cost, some £36,000, some of us expect a lot more,
merlin said:But isn't it JW's old system![]()
Have to ask why, if it really was that good, Mr Watson was happy to sell it on don't you.
Yes Merlin. It's actually not really all that good, but we had you going, eh?merlin said:But isn't it JW's old system![]()
Have to ask why, if it really was that good, Mr Watson was happy to sell it on don't you.
The Devil said:Yes Merlin. It's actually not really all that good,
merlin said:Glad to see you talking sense James, now can we have that RT 60 measurement?
Good to see youwadia-miester said:Morning Tom
Most of the time the answer is quite simple: pile up the cabs and make it so bloody loud (just avoiding feedback, by whatever means necessary) you can't hear a damn thing anyway.Sgt Rock said:These venues have large and diffuse sound fields in the audience sitting areas. It is these diffuse sound fields that make up the context for critical RT-60 measurements.
fox said:I'm wondering how relevant this measurement (as Andy has pointed out is usually quoted for large spaces like cathedrals) is for an enclosed space used once for recording?
One of us has to. Have you sorted out the more bass/less bass conundrum?merlin said:Glad to see you talking sense James
The Devil said:Have you sorted out the more bass/less bass conundrum?