Hi,
I notice you continue to insist on making the same illogical argument again and again and it greatly troubles me that a man who is reasonably well educated (eg has passed more than 5 OL's) would make such an argument at all:
The Devil said:
So, er, how has the ATC midrange dome driver come to be so widely revered in audio and studio applications, when in fact it is heavily-compromised sonically
You make a claim. This claim is:
"ATC midrange dome driver is widely revered in audio and studio applications"
You do not specify what you mean by "widely".
The impression an unaware, impressionalble may gain from this statement is that ATC's are generally revered and that any studio that has not got them (which is probably better than 99% of the studios in the world and at least 90% of the top commercial ones) would love to have them but is too cheap to get them.
That is simply not true. ATC's are "revered" by a few individuals, they are accepted as well performing studio monitor by even fewer sound professionals, the vast majority of sound professionals and studio's choose to do without ATC.
So, I think the best available translation from "hyperbolic supersonic labour style spin" to "plain english" is:
"Some studios and sound professionals use ATC, most don't. There is only a minor cult of the 'adoradation of the ATC Midrange Driver' while most sound professionals find other solutions, most of the time large to very large format compression drivers preferable".
And this brings me right back to the core of the argument.
You make many claims about ATC's speakers and their "popularity" and well as performance which show only the most tenuous grasp of reality and seem derived mainly from marketing spin produced by ATC. When that is not enough you drop the same two names again and again, as if they where in any particular relevance.
So, you like ATC speakers. Fine, be my guest. Just please stick to observable facts when making public statements. You will probably be taken much more serious by others if you actually simply stuck to your guns based on YOUR OWN PERSONAL experience and preference, instead of trying to "oneupman" others by parroting marketing spin.
Ciao T
PS, I have noticed that you have pointedly avoided to comment comparing the documented measured performance of the SCM50 with the others mentioned, you mearly posted more baseless hyperbole, how about it, do a formal comparison and for the record, ATC is a regular advertising with fairly large adverts in HFN.