Originally posted by GrahamN
Accepted, and in that case it's even more hypocritical to have railed so unconstructively against the attempts to elicidate "Useful Information".
Graham, it was just such experimentation that led me to accept that there could be audible differences without variations showing up in the frequency response plot. So personally I would not suggest it is hypocritical, although the sniping that comes from the likes of Lawrie and the Pussies really does require a response. The trouble is Graham, if I tell people that alterations to transient behavior of frequencies above 30khz can clearly affect the perceived authenticity of a cymbol, everyone blats out the usual school book crap and quote various accepted (if ancient) theories.
So I cannot be bothered to argue the point. If that's unacceptable to you I'm sorry. But don't stop posting Graham, the likelihood is that troublemakers like Me and WM will soon clear off anyway, as this place just ain't the same anymore with all these physicists poisoning the minds of the free.
Changing your kit every month works for you but then as as someone with a box fetish and very little interest in music, that's understandable.
Ah typical Lawrie

FWIW, I've had my speakers two years, and have only had one amplification change during that period. So I'd say it's pretty stable mate, unlike you.
If you refuse to allow someone free reign to demonstrate the differences amongst products that you poo-poo in a blind test, purely because you have either a sad predjustice or a fear of knowledge, then I truly feel sorry for you.
But never mind, you can always swap another box, as you seem to spend your whole life doing judging from the epic descriptions of your rivetting testing procedures that appear like a pox across the internet
But before posting here, or anywhere else for that matter, it really would be great if you could check your facts and stop yourself from becoming the subject of numerous private jokes
