REL Quake

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a life other than reading delusioned moans about your bad motorcycles... :p

This is a test with some measurements on an Harley similar to mine, I had better aftermarket parts, for instance a Vince & Hines ehxaust...

The result, as noted above, is very similar to Harley's Stage III kit. On the Dynojet dynamometer at Doyle's Harley-Davidson in Eugene, Oregon, this engine produced 86.6 horsepower at 5250 RPM, and 96.4 ft-lbs. of torque at about 4000 RPM, measured at the rear wheel.

The WinPEP Dynojet Performance Program, based on the dyno results from Doyle's Dynojet dynamometer as quoted above, predicts a best 0 to 60 mph acceleration time of 2.6 seconds, and a top speed of approximately 140 mph!

The whole bike feels solid, unperturbed by the vagaries of life on the road. Vibration from the big V-twin rumbling beneath you is quite noticeable at idle when you are not accustomed to it, but the frequency is low and not uncomfortable. As you accelerate the vibration diminishes. The rubber engine mounts and other rubber-mounted parts, and the Sport's chassis tuning, effectively isolates the rider from intrusive engine vibration. At cruising speed the bike is surprisingly smooth, less tiring than many of the multi-cylinder bikes I have ridden.

The weight and steering geometry of the FXDX lets its rider ignore wind blast from trucks and crosswinds that would upset lesser bikes. The supple suspension soaks up road irregularities with ease. It takes a substantial pothole to get the rider's attention.

The engine's monster torque allows you to pass slower vehicles with a twist of the wrist; throw in a downshift and it's like they went into reverse. The test bike's modified V-twin engine has quite a bit more roll-on acceleration at cruising speed than many sport bikes, especially fours. You must be careful not to run them down from behind when passing cars if you are riding in a mixed group.

The Sport's good manners and ability to attack corners belies its size and weight. For reasons I don't fully understand, it feels like a much lighter and shorter motorcycle. Steering is light and predictable, and it reverses direction (lean) easily. At speeds below triple digits the bike feels well planted in sweeping turns. (I have no personal experience at higher speeds.)
Click to expand...
 
merlin said:
Forgive me here - I know f all about motorbikes!

But what sort of bike should one be looking for if you fancied having a bike, but didn't want to kill yourself within six months of passing your test. Of course, the thing has to look the nuts as well :D
Click to expand...
Obviously a Honda CBR125R...

prd_bike_black.gif


prd_Supersports_CBR125R_gal7_2.gif


Top speed of about 80mph once derestricted. Very zippy in the 8000-12000rpm powerband. Looks great. Small, light and easy to handle. Docile around town (unlike the Aprilia RS125).
 
Now that would suit you Antonio.

Almost a bike but not quite, like "almost a hifi but not quite" if you get my drift :D
 
Antonio, thats not exactly impressive is it, unless you like crap slow bikes.
Try to get around 116BHP at wheel, standing quarter [email protected]. 56.4 ft.lbs @ 10000 RPM, coupled with dry weight of 205KG's, a hardley has no chance against it, the figures show that and experiance also shows it.
Do you understand power to weight ratio?
Frame geometry?


Why do you have the urge to try and show your toys are sooooo good, inferiority?
At least try to make an argument thats is not ridiculously laughable.


You really dont see it do you, HARLEYS ARE CRAP:rolleyes:
 
Merlin,

Why dont you crawl back to your hifi coffins and leave me alone... :p

Now back to business, this is what I have been telling you wannabe racers, capisce... :rolleyes:

The test bike's modified V-twin engine has quite a bit more roll-on acceleration at cruising speed than many sport bikes, especially fours. You must be careful not to run them down from behind when passing cars if you are riding in a mixed group.
Click to expand...
 
penance said:
Why do you have the urge to try and show your toys are sooooo good, inferiority?
At least try to make an argument thats is not ridiculously laughable.
Click to expand...


Mr P, you will never win an argument with Antonio because it is sadly impossible to counter the totally irrational. Possibly best to just laugh and remember that everyone else is doing exactly the same thing ;)
 
merlin said:
it is sadly impossible to counter the totally irrational. Possibly best to just laugh and remember that everyone else is doing exactly the same thing ;)
Click to expand...

Very well put, you are forgiven Merlin... :beer:
 
penance said:
I think your right merlin, let him live in his fairy tale. Where hardleys win everything, and you dont always have to be nonce to ride one, nice chaps Antonio.
Click to expand...

You still dont understand, ok, I will say it once more... :SLEEP:

The test bike's modified V-twin engine has quite a bit more roll-on acceleration at cruising speed than many sport bikes, especially fours. You must be careful not to run them down from behind when passing cars if you are riding in a mixed group.
Click to expand...


:ffrc: :ffrc: :ffrc: :ffrc: :ffrc:
 
indeed that article is so bs it is laughable, im glad you medication is working.

But do try to wake up Antonio, you do make youself look silly.

You dont know much about bikes do you....
 
Antonio, when it comes to pure speed and handling then Penanace is correct a Sports bile will waste a Harley, when it comes to gently cruising along a sunny road then I'm sure you would be more comfortable with the Harley, FWIW I actually like the noise harleys make but some have too much chrome etc, you are completely wrong about the sports bike though and these guys will continue to try and let you make a fool of yourself, argue the virtues of the harley compared to the sports bikes, ie lazy effertless performance, it would be like comparing a large sedan to a compact 2 seater sports car, both types of bike are designerd for completely different jobs,the sports/race replica are designed to go as fast as possible everywhere, whereas harleys and other lowriders, are designed for covering long distances in comfort. Admit that the sports bike would slaughter a harley in quickest point to point race however if you had to traverse europe say 1000 miles plus then the harley would prolly be the better companion.

Merlin admits to knowing FA about bikes so don't argue with him on this, but Andy is correct with regard to performance.
 
I've just bought a new pair of cans :)

they don't need separate amp as can be run from PAmp any one care to uess which model?

they haven't been delivered yet so can't comment, bought them blind(or should that be deaf?)so will post my impression when I get them.
 
Don't have any Andy, never been a great fan, but the missus complains and sometimes I just want to listen when no-one else does, they will prolly only be used when I am unable to listen to speakers.

No guesses yet?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top