[quote="lAmBoY, post: 701630"]What do you expect from a yorkist:)[/QUOTE] I thought that Yorkist was a chocolate bar ... and you were from Telford. [QUOTE]If it is linked to a known system or organ in the body and not some spiritual energy then there may be some substance. Again, the term energy requires clarification, specifically spiritual energy.[/QUOTE] I'll step up to the plate (or into the stockades). I don't believe that the chakras are linked to a specific system or organ of the body. I look upon them as a construct which can aid understanding for those on the spiritual paths dealing with the moving of Kundalini energy. My own biofeedback and meditation teacher, the late C. Maxwell Cade, was of the view that all forms of meditation, spiritual growth and even many therapies, deal with the movement of Kundalini energy, [I]whether they know it or not[/I]. One of the books he liked was an obscure work by Lee Sannella MD called "Kundalini - Transcendance or Psychosis", in which he argued that some of what is now described as psychosis would be labelled in a different culture or time as symptoms of the shake up due to spiritual growth. I dare say that everything I've said so far is more likely to confuse than enlighten. Nevertheless, I shall plough on regardless... I teach Ki Aikido (as you may recall) a martial art which deals with the coordination of mind and body. 'Ki' is the Japanese term meaning 'life energy' ('Chi' or 'Qi' in Chinese). I do not, however, believe that this is an energy in the physical sense and don't even think it matters whether it exists or not. As with Kundalini, it's a construct that can help understanding. Look at it this way, I could tell you that a sense of positivity, or that you 'can do' something, has a positive effect on the body and what you can achieve physically - and you might believe it, particularly if I could give you a clear physical demonstration then and there. For the sake of shorthand and as a teaching method, I sometime refer to this as feeling 'life energy'. If I wanted you to 'extend your mind' through your fingertips and beyond, in the execution of a specific technique or exercise, I might ask you to hold your arm in a relaxed way and act [I]as if[/I] energy is flowing through beyond the fingertips, like water through a hosepipe. Whether or not the energy actually exists is of little concern to me. What works, works. Similarly in 'hands-on' healing, I don't care whether a healer is a member of an organisation that believes that they are channelling the healing power of someone long-dead. Nor do I care whether they believe that they are acting as an instrument of God or Christ. It doesn't matter to me whether the healing arises purely from a parent's love for their child. I am only concerned with what passes between healer and 'healee' in their interaction. I don't believe that there is necessarily any exchange of physical or electromagnetic energy taking place. However, the interaction proceeds [I]as if[/I] there was an energy exchange. Therefore, when I'm practising or teaching 'healing', I do so on that basis. It makes things easier. So does that explain at least my position on these 'energies'. No, I didn't think so. It would be easier to discuss these matters directly, 'hands-on' so to speak.