ATC studio monitors

James,

We vend cables, amplifiers (our own and others), Digital electronics, Modifications (CDP/amps/pre's Speakers), and a/v section. Plus an install service& system diagnosis. I do appologise for the confusion James.

 

Further to Thorsens post of sound quality you may find this interesting.Clips-Vil USA

 

I did wonder what it was that you did.

So, if you had managed to, er, "vend" me some cables, would you be taking every opportunity to kick every single item of hi-fi equipment I own?

Just curious.

 

James,

I do believe you are being naughty now, your such a wicked person :devil:

 

:d

 

I now have the ATC review scanned in if anyone want's a copy, or if someone wants to post it up on here.

 

If it has measurements, I'd like a copy, please: markus dot c dot sauer at t-online dot de

 

Hi,

i am sure an excerpt of the measurement section will fall under "fair use" and you can host the image on www.imageshack.us for free.

Ciao T

 

http://img159.echo.cx/my.php?image=atca7xn.jpg

http://img159.echo.cx/my.php?image=atcb3co.jpg

 

Thanks Paul.

No measurements, alas.

 

Ive got to admit, I dont understand why published statistics are hard to come by for this brand of speaker.

It makes no sense to me at all, given that many of the customers they are looking for are studio engineers - to whom plotted and graphed figures will be important when they are choosing studio monitors.

 

I don't think measurements are that hard to come by. A phone call to ATC would probably get them.

-- Ian

 

Its kinda funny that we'll debate the subject over 17 pages of forum squabbles, but no-one's done that! haha.

I'd feel like an idiot asking them myself as a) the figures dont mean anything to me anyway b) Ive no interest in buying their speakers so would be wasting their time

 

That's why this thread is the same as the (in some ways) dreadful preamp one on pfm.

 

I thought it was Jason Kennedy's review to which you were reffering, IMHO we'd have got a more unbiased view if Bub had written it.

 

Why?

 

IME he seems to favour kit of a flatter earth nature, when reviewing. But i susprct you knew what I meant.

 

There is no such thing as "flat Earth", it's all marketing nonsense got up by the 1980s hi-fi press.

If you are implying that ATCs don't "image", I think you are wrong.

 

Yeah but a lot got sucked in and are still living the dream

That word "Think", makes that your opinion, to which you are entitled, others disagree. It's all subjective really, just like Mr Kennedy's review.

The fact is I wasn't implying anything, other than JK reviews favourably, kit which has been labeled "Flat Earth" ie offers a particular type of presentation.

 

And of course his system at home was Avatar OBX/Border Patrol based. Hardly classic flattie gear is it?